GPT-4告诉你：各分数段的一个典型雅思小作文长什么样

对于雅思写作的备考，了解自己当前的水平很重要。以小作文，如果老师给你的打分是6分，那你一定很想知道对应的7分甚至8分主体段长什么样子。

让人类老师来做这个事情费时费力，会很辛苦，因为要按照你的原文的思想来改写的难度是不小的。

但是，如果让GPT-4来做，就是小菜一碟。

下面我下指令给GPT-4，让它以下面的图表题分别给出5，6，7和8分的小作文，并解释原因。

Thetable below gives information on consumer spending on different itemsin five different countries in 2002.

Summarisethe information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant.

先是各分数段作文及英文解释：

各分数段作文：

**Band5:**

1.The given table presents data about how consumers in five differentcountries spent their money on various items in the year 2002.

2.Overall, the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was inTurkey, while the least was in Italy. Similarly, the maximum andminimum expenditures on clothing and footwear were seen in Italy andSweden, respectively.

3.In terms of food, drinks, and tobacco, Turkey spent the most with apercentage of 32.14%, followed by Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and lastlyItaly, which spent only 16.36%.

4.When looking at clothing and footwear, Italy was the biggest spenderwith 9%, while the lowest was Sweden with 5.40%. For leisure andeducation, Turkey again spent the most at 4.35%, with Irelandspending the least at 2.21%.

**Band6:**

1.The table provides a comparative view of consumer expenditure onvarious commodities in five distinct countries during 2002.

2.Overall, Turkey reported the highest spending on food, drinks, andtobacco, whereas Italy had the lowest. Conversely, Italy had thehighest spending on clothing and footwear, while Sweden reported thelowest.

3.In more detail, Turkey led the pack with a hefty 32.14% of theirspending directed towards food, drinks, and tobacco, followed byIreland, Spain, Sweden, and finally Italy with a mere 16.36%expenditure on the same.

4.On the other hand, Italy emerged as the top spender on clothing andfootwear with a 9% share, while Sweden lagged behind with a meagre5.40%. As far as leisure and education are concerned, Turkey led witha 4.35% expenditure, with Ireland trailing at 2.21%.

**Band7:**

1.The table elucidates the patterns of consumer expenditure on a trioof sectors across five diverse nations in 2002.

2.Overall, the bulk of spending on food, drinks, and tobacco wasreported in Turkey, while Italy exhibited the lowest spending. Incontrast, Italy topped the list for clothing and footwearexpenditure, with Sweden at the bottom.

3.Diving deeper, Turkey allocated a substantial 32.14% of its totalexpenditure to food, drinks, and tobacco, followed by Ireland, Spain,Sweden, and Italy, which earmarked just 16.36% for these items.

4.Conversely, Italy devoted 9% of its spending to clothing andfootwear, nearly twice the amount set aside by Sweden, whichcontributed a paltry 5.40%. With respect to leisure and education,Turkey again led the pack with a 4.35% expenditure, while Irelandspent the least at 2.21%.

**Band8:**

1.The table furnishes an in-depth comparison of consumer spendinghabits across food, drinks, tobacco, clothing, footwear, and leisureand education in five different countries during the year 2002.

2. Overall, it is evident that Turkey demonstratedthe highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco, whereas Italyreported the minimum. On the contrary, Italy led in spending onclothing and footwear, with Sweden bringing up the rear.

3.A closer examination reveals that Turkey dedicated a significant32.14% of their total spending to food, drinks, and tobacco,substantially more than Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and particularlyItaly, which committed a minimal 16.36% to these commodities.

4.In a reversal of fortunes, Italy led the way in the clothing andfootwear category with an expenditure of 9%, almost double that ofSweden, which allocated only 5.40%. The trend of spending on leisureand education was dominated by Turkey at 4.35%, nearly twice theamount invested by Ireland, the least spending country at 2.21%.

解释：

**Band5:**

"Thegiven table presents data about how consumers in five differentcountries spent their money on various items in the year 2002."

Thisintroductory sentence is a simple paraphrase of the prompt, which isexpected at this band level. However, it doesn't add any significantdetails or insights about the data.

"Overall,the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was in Turkey,while the least was in Italy. Similarly, the maximum and minimumexpenditures on clothing and footwear were seen in Italy and Sweden,respectively."

Theoverview provides the main trends but is quite basic and doesn'thighlight the key comparisons or anomalies.

Inthe following sentences, the candidate presents the data without anyclear logical organization. The vocabulary ("highest","lowest") and sentence structures are quite simple, andthere are no complex sentences or advanced grammatical structures.

Thisresponse is a Band 5 because it meets the minimum requirements of thetask: it presents the data and provides an overview. However, itdoesn't showcase a wide range of vocabulary, complex sentences, or ahigh degree of coherence and cohesion.

**Band6:**

Theresponse at this band level begins to demonstrate a clearer structureand more detailed overview. The candidate uses more varied vocabulary(e.g., "reported", "expenditure") and morecomplex grammatical structures (e.g., "whereas"). Thecandidate also starts to make more detailed comparisons between thecountries.

Thisresponse is a Band 6 because it goes beyond merely presenting thedata and provides more detailed analysis. It shows a wider range ofvocabulary and more complex sentences, though there might still besome grammatical errors.

**Band7:**

Atthis band level, the candidate provides a comprehensive overview anddetailed comparisons. The candidate uses advanced vocabulary (e.g.,"allocated", "earmarked") and complex grammaticalstructures (e.g., "nearly twice the amount set aside bySweden"). The response is well-organized, with clear transitionsbetween ideas.

Thisresponse is a Band 7 because it fulfills all aspects of the task withfew errors. It uses a wide range of vocabulary and complex sentencesaccurately, and it demonstrates a high level of coherence andcohesion.

**Band8:**

Atthis band level, the candidate provides an in-depth analysis of thedata. The candidate uses sophisticated vocabulary (e.g., "furnishes","allocated", "demonstrated") and complexgrammatical structures (e.g., "in a reversal of fortunes").The response is highly coherent, with logical progression and cleartransitions between ideas.

Thisresponse is a Band 8 because it excels in all aspects of the task. Ituses a wide range of vocabulary and complex sentences accurately andappropriately, and it is highly coherent and cohesive.

中文版翻译和解释

这里给出中文版翻译和解释，方便同学们能更清楚和直观的了解各主要分数段的一个典型的雅思小作文长什么样和其中的差别：

**5分数段：**

"这个表格展示了2002年五个不同国家的消费者在不同项目上的消费情况。"

这个引言句子是对提示的简单释义，这在这个分数段是预期的。然而，它没有添加关于数据的任何重要细节或洞察。

"总的来说，土耳其在食物、饮料和烟草上的支出最高，而意大利的支出最低。相似地，衣物和鞋类的支出在意大利最高，而在瑞典最低。"

概述提供了主要的趋势，但是相当基础，没有突出关键的比较或异常。

在接下来的句子中，考生呈现数据，但没有任何明确的逻辑组织。词汇（"支出最多"，"支出最少"）和句子结构相当简单，没有复杂的句子或高级的语法结构。

这个回答是5分，因为它满足任务的最低要求：它呈现了数据并提供了概述。然而，它没有展示出广泛的词汇，复杂的句子，或高度的连贯性和粘连性。

**6分数段：**

这个分数段的回答开始展示出更清晰的结构和更详细的概述。考生使用更多变化的词汇（例如，"报告"，"支出"）和更复杂的语法结构（例如，"而"）。考生也开始做更详细的国家之间的比较。

这个回答是6分，因为它超越了仅仅呈现数据，并提供了更详细的分析。它显示了广泛的词汇和更复杂的句子，尽管可能仍然存在一些语法错误。

**7分数段：**

在这个分数段，考生提供了全面的概述和详细的比较。考生使用高级词汇（例如，"分配"，"指定"）和复杂的语法结构（例如，"几乎是瑞典的两倍"）。回答是有组织的，有清晰的思想转换。

这个回答是7分，因为它以很少的错误完成了任务的所有方面。它使用广泛的词汇和准确地使用复杂的句子，它展示了高度的连贯性和粘连性。

**8分数段：**

在这个分数段，考生提供了对数据的深入分析。考生使用复杂的词汇（例如，"提供"，"分配"，"展示"）和复杂的语法结构（例如，"在运气逆转中"）。回答高度连贯，有逻辑的进展和清晰的思想转换。

这个回答是8分，因为它在任务的所有方面都表现出色。它准确和适当地使用了广泛的词汇和复杂的句子，它是高度连贯和粘连的。

通过检查这些示例，中国的雅思考生可以理解不同分数段之间在质量和复杂性方面的区别。他们可以看到如何通过使用更高级的词汇，更复杂的句子，以及提供更详细和连贯的数据分析来提高他们的回答。

本文涉及的指令均收集于雅思终结者ChatGPT指令集。